item found in Provence, 11 May 2009, written by Florent Provansal
Rehabilitation of the center of Marseilles, the arm-of-war continues
Jean-Claude Gaudin refused the "ten suggestions" by Philippe Sanmarco to stay ahead of Marseille Development.
The company in charge of the layout of the Marseille area should have a new president on May 28 This is the date chosen by Philippe Sanmarco, (ex-PS, most municipal), elected to that position last spring, to convene a board of directors of the corporation (SEM), in order to confirm his resignation. The reproach
elected system of governance between the presidency and the direction of the Week and a strategy problem with a policy that does not correspond to the resolution passed municipal February 1, 2008 which allowed the agreement between Convention citizen movement created by Philippe Sanmarco and Gaudin-Muselier ticket for municipal elections.
At the request of the Mayor of Marseille Jean-Claude Gaudin (UMP), first met on April 20, the outgoing president had suspended its decision. But, after a new interview on May 4, Philippe Sanmarco has confirmed. "I have requested a ten-point, those that seem necessary for the exercise of the President." Requests which could not respond favorably Jean-Claude Gaudin.
"Political agreements with Philippe Sanmarco remain unchanged and will continue to be director of the company," said Mayor of Marseille. In addition, I will attend this meeting which will be elected the new president. "The council holds as MPM, 25% of the capital, reward the candidacy of Dominique Vlasto, Deputy Tourism and MEP.
Sanmarco As for Philip, he states that it will vote on May 28 "for a president who accepts his ten proposals." While ensuring that it stays in the local majority.
The Ten Philippe Sanmarco not to resign
"The foundations of a minimum acceptable position for any president are: 1 - The company accounts must be validated by an outside agency. The last control is the regional chamber of accounts and over 10 years ago. No organization can afford to rely on word of its CEO so long without external control. It is a decision to be taken immediately.
2 - This control should be first on the whole account. But also on activities, one by one. The PRI is in the forefront of balances to ask for one can not deploy a new political center without having a record of 10 years.
3 - Regarding the sequence of operations in the city center, the deliberation of the municipal council dated February 1, 2008 must be strictly respected. Now not only is this not the case, but there trends reverse. Worse, having failed to impose the automatic renewal of its concession, the CEO is now dragging things or makes them more and more impossible to resolve, to the detriment of the interests of the city. In order to see the end of 2009 we are in a deadlock and has emerged as the savior after putting in jeopardy the public interest. This issue has become emblematic and urgent: it is the reason why the CEO should be immediately withdrawn in favor of a Deputy CEO reporting to the President and Council, in conjunction direct the General Secretariat of the Town.
4 - Regarding the other major business areas, the long-standing requirements of the CRC must be strictly observed, "the dealer must provide annually to the community, a plan of the discounted cash transaction showing the schedule of revenue and expenditure and a note of economic conditions on the physical and financial completion of the transaction during the past year compared to original estimates and forecasts for the coming year ... . Therefore the operations of the center city (PRI, zac de la Bourse), but also that of Zac Capelette that du Rouet, that of Saint Martha, those of Vallon Régny and Jarre is an emergency organized meetings within the spirit and letter of the remarks of the CRC, which is indeed the aspiration of all elected officials concerned, especially as these documents are not limited to developments soothing as is unfortunately the present.
5 - For the future, the CEO must be divested of any communication activity, exclusively reserved to the President. The monthly newsletter will be suspended in order that its purpose and its contents are reviewed in depth.
6 - The CEO's personal situation should be clarified immediately when he refused to disclose his employment by threatening consequences of a possible early departure which nobody knows the conditions and surrounded by a total opacity.
7 - The CEO must agree to confirm that he did not hide behind hypothetical decisions of the Mayor's office and improperly utilized. Moreover we must integrate the fact that there are other shareholders that the city of Marseille and that all must be respected. In particular, it is time to realize that MPM is a separate community which also depends on the future of Marseille Development.
8 - A question asked by the CEO a director must be a written response. This document must be given to the directors who made the request, unless the CEO is happy to read it and keep it for himself.
9 - A scientific committee composed of independent persons will be created with the board of directors will solicit his opinion on topics of their choice. More generally the use of external expertise will be developed.
10 - To carry out its mission, the chairman may be assisted by one or two assistants of his choice ".
Jean-Claude Gaudin refused the "ten suggestions" by Philippe Sanmarco to stay ahead of Marseille Development.
The company in charge of the layout of the Marseille area should have a new president on May 28 This is the date chosen by Philippe Sanmarco, (ex-PS, most municipal), elected to that position last spring, to convene a board of directors of the corporation (SEM), in order to confirm his resignation. The reproach
elected system of governance between the presidency and the direction of the Week and a strategy problem with a policy that does not correspond to the resolution passed municipal February 1, 2008 which allowed the agreement between Convention citizen movement created by Philippe Sanmarco and Gaudin-Muselier ticket for municipal elections.
At the request of the Mayor of Marseille Jean-Claude Gaudin (UMP), first met on April 20, the outgoing president had suspended its decision. But, after a new interview on May 4, Philippe Sanmarco has confirmed. "I have requested a ten-point, those that seem necessary for the exercise of the President." Requests which could not respond favorably Jean-Claude Gaudin.
"Political agreements with Philippe Sanmarco remain unchanged and will continue to be director of the company," said Mayor of Marseille. In addition, I will attend this meeting which will be elected the new president. "The council holds as MPM, 25% of the capital, reward the candidacy of Dominique Vlasto, Deputy Tourism and MEP.
Sanmarco As for Philip, he states that it will vote on May 28 "for a president who accepts his ten proposals." While ensuring that it stays in the local majority.
The Ten Philippe Sanmarco not to resign
"The foundations of a minimum acceptable position for any president are: 1 - The company accounts must be validated by an outside agency. The last control is the regional chamber of accounts and over 10 years ago. No organization can afford to rely on word of its CEO so long without external control. It is a decision to be taken immediately.
2 - This control should be first on the whole account. But also on activities, one by one. The PRI is in the forefront of balances to ask for one can not deploy a new political center without having a record of 10 years.
3 - Regarding the sequence of operations in the city center, the deliberation of the municipal council dated February 1, 2008 must be strictly respected. Now not only is this not the case, but there trends reverse. Worse, having failed to impose the automatic renewal of its concession, the CEO is now dragging things or makes them more and more impossible to resolve, to the detriment of the interests of the city. In order to see the end of 2009 we are in a deadlock and has emerged as the savior after putting in jeopardy the public interest. This issue has become emblematic and urgent: it is the reason why the CEO should be immediately withdrawn in favor of a Deputy CEO reporting to the President and Council, in conjunction direct the General Secretariat of the Town.
4 - Regarding the other major business areas, the long-standing requirements of the CRC must be strictly observed, "the dealer must provide annually to the community, a plan of the discounted cash transaction showing the schedule of revenue and expenditure and a note of economic conditions on the physical and financial completion of the transaction during the past year compared to original estimates and forecasts for the coming year ... . Therefore the operations of the center city (PRI, zac de la Bourse), but also that of Zac Capelette that du Rouet, that of Saint Martha, those of Vallon Régny and Jarre is an emergency organized meetings within the spirit and letter of the remarks of the CRC, which is indeed the aspiration of all elected officials concerned, especially as these documents are not limited to developments soothing as is unfortunately the present.
5 - For the future, the CEO must be divested of any communication activity, exclusively reserved to the President. The monthly newsletter will be suspended in order that its purpose and its contents are reviewed in depth.
6 - The CEO's personal situation should be clarified immediately when he refused to disclose his employment by threatening consequences of a possible early departure which nobody knows the conditions and surrounded by a total opacity.
7 - The CEO must agree to confirm that he did not hide behind hypothetical decisions of the Mayor's office and improperly utilized. Moreover we must integrate the fact that there are other shareholders that the city of Marseille and that all must be respected. In particular, it is time to realize that MPM is a separate community which also depends on the future of Marseille Development.
8 - A question asked by the CEO a director must be a written response. This document must be given to the directors who made the request, unless the CEO is happy to read it and keep it for himself.
9 - A scientific committee composed of independent persons will be created with the board of directors will solicit his opinion on topics of their choice. More generally the use of external expertise will be developed.
10 - To carry out its mission, the chairman may be assisted by one or two assistants of his choice ".
0 comments:
Post a Comment